For a month, Memphis
sporting fans had been hyped about the upcoming fight between the great black
fighters Sam Langford and the former Welterweight Champion the “Dixie Kid.” A local
newspaper paper mockingly noted blacks had “been saving for days and days
trying to rake together $2 admission to see [Jack] Johnson’s only rival in his
race,” and “every smoke in town” bought a ticket. With black fans buying a good
portion of the seats, the Langford-Dixie Kid fight was the most successful
battle in Memphis history. But a week later, racial complaints resurfaced about
boxing in Memphis. White fans had been complaining for the last 8 months about
the lack of good white fighters. A local sportswriter commented that the “Phoenix
Athletic club ought to have found out by this time that negroes will not turn
out unless there is a strong negro attraction… More white bouts on such
occasions would make a hit with the fight crowd.” In other words, the club
needed to focus on white spectators and host white fights. But, this was easier
said than done. Black athletes represented the best product and the most
lucrative paydays for the club. As one writer observed, “the biggest houses at
the Phoenix have been drawn by negro fights—and the patronage was always about
three whites to one coon [black.]” “White bouts,” on the other hand, did not
draw “overly well.” Much like the Atlanta Hawks’ owner Bruce Levenson, the
Phoenix Athletic Club [Memphis] had business problems revolving around race and
fandom. How do you attract white spectators? And what do you do with black fans?
But this was 1910, not 2012.
Selling sports
tickets has always been about white spectatorship. Black fandom, however, has
been an afterthought. Before the mass integration of team sports, most black
spectators attended horse races and prizefights. In white sports entertainment
spaces, however, whites treated black fans like pathogens and not participants
in the spectatorship process. Whites openly complained about the proximity of
black fans and detested their presence. Black fans in the stands reminded
whites of social equality that whites did not want to accept. To deal with the
problem of black fandom, while also appeasing white fans and keeping black
dollars, stadiums, clubs, and arenas segregated blacks. Newspapers commonly
mocked the black section by referring to them as “smokes” and “darktown.” But,
as long as black spectatorship remained relatively small, whites could deal
with the supposed black problem.
In post WWII
America, however, the Second Great Migration and the integration of team sports
resulted in the first mass wave of black spectators in white sporting spaces.
Black fans flocked to major league ballparks to see their black stars in action.
After the Brooklyn Dodgers signed Jackie Robinson the team sold out most of
their home and road games. Based on rumor alone, black fans in Detroit bought
40,000 tickets to see Satchel Paige pitch for the Cleveland Indians. While some
teams like the Indians signed black players to tap into a black fan base, many
franchises like Detroit refused to acknowledge their presence. Reportedly, the
increase in black fans pushed Brooklyn to move to Los Angeles. The Atlanta
Braves, for example, have continued to avoid recruiting black fans. The
situation got so bad that in 2000 Braves icon Hank Aaron, complained “[Blacks] aren't wanted
on the field and they're not wanted in the stands, and that's the gospel
truth." Unfortunately, it seems that the Atlanta Hawks are following
the Braves.
The most ironic
aspect about the Hawks’ black problem is that the Hawks once openly recruited
black fans. During the 1971 season blacks comprised 8% of the fans and only
bought 9 season tickets in Atlanta. In comparison the Baltimore Bullets (32%)
and the Detroit Pistons (30%) had the highest black attendance. In 1972, the
Hawks GM Richie Guerin met with local black businessmen to develop a strategy
to attract black spectators and season ticket holders. Guerin told the group “
We really need your help because the whole league has been lax in the area.” He
continued, saying “But I’m more interesting in Atlanta than in the rest of the
league.” To woo a black fan base, the Hawks leadership decided to use black
business leaders to recruit other black middle-class customers. Forty years
later, we see that the Hawks’ strategy worked and black spectatorship grew to
70%. So what did the Atlanta Hawk do about their success?
Although their
problems were 100 years apart, the Phoenix Athletic Club and Levenson arrived
at the same answer. They cowardly capitulated to their white fans. In Memphis,
in 1910, the club “comprising bankers, millionaires and others,” had
“gradually placed more white and less black in the color scheme for the
preliminary sport.” In short, the Phoenix Athletic Club stopped featuring black
fighters as headliners and actively sought out white talent. But the Hawks can’t
replace their black product with white talent. It doesn’t work like that in the
NBA. Instead of courting black dollars, Levenson fell back on an old trope that
that situated black spectators as bad for business. He wrote “My theory is that the black crowd scared away the whites
and there are simply not enough affluent black fans to build a significant[sic]
season ticket base. Please dont get me wrong. There was nothing threatening
going on in the arean[sic] back then. i never felt uncomfortable, but i think
southern whites simply were not comfortable being in an arena or at a bar where
they were in the minority.” To draw more whites fans, he proposed more
white cheerleaders, less black people on the kissing cam, and changing the
music to appeal to white audiences. The tactics might have changed, but the
goal remained the same. The black fan base was reduced to roughly 40%, still
too high for Levenson. But the Hawks and other teams need to know, black
spectators will support a quality product. Franchises should follow the 1972
Hawks and actively recruit black fans.